User talk:GCarty

Propaganda films

I think we are getting a little too specific about the categories. I think Category:Nazi world War II propaganda films is a little redundant, we could just put the Nazi propaganda link there. Same with the Japanese cat.--Dudeman5685 23:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merging Offshoring and Offshore Outsourcing

Had you bothered to look, this discussion has already taken place under Talk:Offshore_outsourcing. Please do not put up that request again. Vicissidude 22:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Good eye on list of terrorist incidents -- I was just thinking more detail should be added there. -戴&#30505sv 08:08, Sep 11, 2003 (UTC) -

Please see: Talk:Communist and post-Communist Albania regarding pyramid schemes. --Dori 14:02, 12 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Hi there! When moving pages, please use the special link in the sidebar rather than cut & paste content -- it moves the page's history too. -- Tarquin 17:35, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)

I'd already tried this and it was rejected.

That might have been because you were moving it to an already-existing name. Michael Hardy 01:09, 11 Dec 2003 (UTC)

In re Ginzburg-Landau theory, please note that the title phrase should be highlighted at its first appearance, like this. (Someone corrected this after you wrote the article.) Michael Hardy 01:10, 11 Dec 2003 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't know the answer to your question re:Brest-Litovsk (though something in my head is saying the borders differ), but I thought I'd suggest that posting the question at Wikipedia:Reference desk might get you an answer....we do marginally well at covering quesitons posted there, especially clear ones like yours. Jwrosenzweig 18:41, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Adhan in Turkey

Hi, I saw the section you wrote there and I was just wondering if you could source it, if you do this it will make it easier for others to verify what you have written is correct and lessens the chance that it will be removed. gren 12:58, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.islamonline.net/English/ArtCulture/2004/01/article01.shtml GCarty 13:03, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Interlingua

Good idea, there. Thanks from me (a diehard interlinguist)! Almafeta 13:39, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Yes I did look at Interlingua some time ago, but I felt too much temptation to indroduce a full Romance grammar! I had my own inter-Romanic experiment once - the obligatory Lord's Prayer follows in my lashed-up language. What do you think?

Nostro padre que é en le cielo

Santificado seja tu nome.

Venga tu Reino.

Faga-se tu voluntat,

Assí en la terra como en le cielo.

Nostro pan quotidano,

Da-nos hoji e pardona-nos nostras débitas,

assí como nós pardonamos a nostros debitores.

E no nos laixes cader en la tentation,

Ma libera-nos de mal. Amen.

The other point is using vocabulary at odds with Romance practice - such as using attaccos rather than attentatos to refer to terrorist attacks, or to use the horribly laboured charpa de capite (seen on INTERLNG) rather than pannello de collo or even hijab (which seems international enough to me). One addition to the vocabulary I'd like to introduce - can I call a puppet government "un governamento fantoche"? (FR/ES/PT fantoche, IT fantoccio) GCarty 14:22, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Two questions re your own inter-Romance tongue: what does the x (laixes) mean?

It's pronounced "lashes" - the orthography is Catalan-inspired. It's a subjuctive of "to let" (cf. French tu laisses, Italian lasci) GCarty 16:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My own tastes find it odd, because of the the way that the possessive adjective nostro sounds, but that's me.

And what do the accents mean -- stress change, or sound change?

Accents function as in Spanish. GCarty 16:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that Interlingua didn't intend to be purely Romantic, although I sometimes replace Interlingua's verb rules with a faux-Romantic set to make it sound like an obscure European tongue.

Finally, regarding "fantoche": French uses fantoche, but Spanish uses títere -- if the interwiki links on puppet state are correct. For now, I'd keep it, but add the {{parola-non-official}} template to the top of the article. Almafeta 15:11, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Títere" is more common, but "Fantoche" is sometimes used too, at least if a Google search is anything to go by. GCarty 16:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, feel free to get your own account there! Almafeta 15:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly suggestions

Hi GCarty, I would just like to remind you to always leave an edit summary when making changes to articles. It really helps your fellow editors and only takes a few seconds.

The problem is that when I am changing categories for dozens of articles those "few seconds" add up! Are there any programs for changing categories in articles en masse, so that I don't omit edit summaries for "fast-fingered freddie" reasons? GCarty 19:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to suggest that the minor edit tag might not be appropriate when you are deleting and adding categories in the article. It is really intended for minor changes such as fixing a spelling mistake. Best wishes -- FP ^{<talk><edits>} 02:30, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Template:Campaignbox Balkans Campaign

Is there a way to work it into the Battle of Crete battlebox?

Thanks

Thanks for the extinction fix on the Leptictidium page. After doing so many of those, I was bound to slip up at least once.

--aremisasling 18:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur cat

I noticed you've put Category:Dinosaurs into Category:Prehistoric animals. This seems redundant to me because it's already in Category:Prehistoric reptiles, which is itself in Category:Prehistoric animals. If there's some pressing reason why it needs to be in both the parent and child cat then let me know (should probably note it on the Talk page actually), otherwise it seems pointless. Soo 16:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some people regard dinosaurs as reptiles, while others regard them as a unique class of animals, with both reptilian and avian characteristics. I put Category:Dinosaurs into both Category:Prehistoric animals and Category:Prehistoric reptiles in order to accommodate both these viewpoints. GCarty 17:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Executed secret agent Doihara

I'd reverted your edit [1] Doihara was executed but not as or because of being secret agent. Please try to use categories only for most important things/features and check whether they really apply. TIA Pavel Vozenilek 00:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CFD redirects

Please don't use hard redirects in categories. There is a bug in the mediawiki software which causes these to work incorrectly. There is more information about this at Wikipedia:Categorization#Redirected_categories If a soft direct is necessary, use {{Category redirect|target category}}. Most times, though, if you are working on the cleanup section of WP:CFD, the soft directs are there so a bot will move the articles, so nothing needs to be done. --Kbdank71 15:41, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Tours

whatever your faith, please do not vandalize the name of Emir Abdul Rahman Al Ghafiqi Abd al Rahman, or remove his name from the list of dead -- his life was sufficiently important in history that he deserved to be mentioned in the list of those killed. Your edits are ill-informed, hopefully you don't know better. If you do edit, please leave an explanation. Otherwise, as in this one, it is simply reverted. old windy bear 21:50, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that you are not aware of the conventions for battleboxes - a dagger (†) beside a commander's name indicates he was killed in the battle. GCarty 08:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no problem, however, you should have left a message in discussion, and his name still belongs in the causalty lists, as he was quite renowned in history -- most users do not know that the dagger indicates death in battle, and the information in the battlebox shows them at once that a significant personality of the times was killed. I had removed the dagger again, till i came here and read why, i then restored it, but left the Emir's name in the losses - which is also appropriate. I have been working on these articles for a year. I welcome any help, but don't know what someone is doing - like with the dagger - if they don't tell me, which is why I suggested leaving a note in discussion on any article when such is done. Cheers!old windy bear 09:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GCarty I understood and agreed with your edit this morning returning the category to the proper place, since Tours took place during the great period of Islamic expansion, during their wars of conquest. But Carty, please, leave a note in discussion so that the guy whose edit you changed understands why! I started to do so, but decided instead to come back here, and ask you to. Your edit was historically correct, but people generally on these history articles explain such an edit, so the other party understands. You were correct on the dagger -- I did not know (Palmdogg is the battle and campaign box king; i compile the lists! -- but now that I do, all is well). But please, for the sake of avoiding editing wars, leave the guy an explanation on the discussion page? It also establishs that you know what you are doing, which you obviously do. This is not being smart with you, but an honest request to leave an explanation so the person who thought -- because Tours was a victory for the Chirstian forces opposing the Islamic Conquest, that it was not a part of the wars in that era -- understands that they were wrong. Thanks! old windy bear 17:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GCarty Carty, you have still not explained your revert of an edit a user made in good faith, not understanding the nature of the battlebox, or why the person who thought -- because Tours was a victory for the Chirstian forces opposing the Islamic Conquest, that it was not a part of the wars in that era -- understands that they were wrong. If you don't start leaving an explanation, one that is sourced, your edits will be reverted. In this case, I happen to agree with you. But wikipedia rules dictate that when you revert - as you did with this -that you leave an explanation in the discussion area, so the person understands the logic of the revert, or leave such in the revert itself. You did neither. Please post it, or I will revert yours, and let the military project coordinator decide the matter. You are simply acting without any respect towards users editing in good faith. Please leave explanations!old windy bear 18:46, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GCarty 1) the Battle of Tours is generally regarded as the turning point of the Muslim invasions of Western Europe, but it is not the end of them, as you would know if you studied the life of Charles Martel, or the Islamic Conquests -- invading forces were turned back again at River Berre and Narbonne by Charles Martel in 736-7; 2) the Muslim conquering presence in western Europe did not fully end until the retaking of the City of Narbonne by Charle's son, Pippin the Short. I reinstated the explanation placed at the Battle of Tours. if you feel this is wrong, feel free to discuss it on the explanation page, or talk to user:Kirill the project coordinator for the Military Project. In any event, your history was incorrect that Tours signaled the end of Muslim invasions of Europe, though western historians, and Muslim historians of that era, regarded it as the "turning point" of said invasions.old windy bear 15:08, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 04:07, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguity

Please see my comments at Talk:List of Muslim reformers. Thanks. --Dweller 10:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minaret of Freedom Institute

Since you have edited this article, you may want to look at the discussion on this deletion nomination. At the moment it certainly does not look like the article will be deleted, but there are serious issues with content that looks pretty much copied from their website, which causes copyright issues. Some reworking of the article might be in order. Fan1967 23:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a reference to the copied content. --GCarty 07:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Category

First, please sign your messages; secondly, this category is both your POV and original research and the claim tha some of them are "indisputable" is entirely ridiculous. Pecher ^Talk 10:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-Islam activists

Greetings GCarty, Although I don't see that you've done so previously, I wanted to give you a friendly note to suggest not adding the likes of Ayaan Hirsi Ali to this category. Anyone who does is very likely to encounter resistance in regards to the whole category. Cheers. Netscott 14:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I understand why you've been encountering resistance to your utilization of this category and it is due to what seems to be a blanket utilization of it. There are those who are anti-Islam activists like Ali Sina but then there are those who are anti-Islamist (or ism) activists like Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Might I suggest making Category:Anti-Islamism activists? or Category:Anti-Islamist activists? Cheers. (→Netscott) 18:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer Category:Secularists of Muslim descent. --GCarty 15:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Category:Secularists of Muslim heritage or Category:Secularists of Muslim lineage as there is no Muslim ethnicity/race. (→Netscott) 12:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Category:Secularists of Muslim heritage it should be... --GCarty 13:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reconquista

Hi GCarty, regarding this edit, I would say that it was not only the Umayyad who respected Jews and Mozarabic Christians, but also the Abbadid of Seville (this is the only Taifa kingdom I'm familiar with). Regards, E Asterion ^{u talking to me?} 23:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I forgot the taifa kingdoms! --GCarty 07:24, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

American propaganda film cats

I agree that the category needed to be split up, but may I suggest some modifications in the new arrangement?

First I think that the Right and Left cats should include domestic as well as foreign policy, as the two can become very intertwined, as late experience has shown, and the terms "anti-communist" and "anti-fascist" doesn't adequeatly cover the respective foreign outlooks. Would an anti-Vietnam war film, for instance, really belong under the anti-fascist cat, or a left wing cat for that matter?

This is what I propose

WWII films (a fairly distinct genre)
General Left and right wing films
Vietnam era films (both anti and pro, left and right. The two are not mutually exclusive.)
Drug and social hygiege films
anti-communist

What do you think?--Dudeman5685 20:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Almost no Americans were outright pro-communist or pro-fascist, so I'd reserve the labels "anti-communist" and "anti-fascist" for relatively non-partisan films. As for Vietnam, either have a specific category, or create a new category for anti-war films (also including films opposing other wars, such as Why We Fight (2005 film)), while putting the pro-war films in the "anti-communist" category. GCarty 21:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Terrorism in country categories

I saw you created the Terrorism in France category a while back. A new user is upset by the use of the word terrorism and is removing categories from pages at random. I would appreciate it if you would take a look at, and consider reverting the user's edits to, East Turkestan Islamic Movement, Grey Wolves, and Kurdistan Workers Party. Thanks, KazakhPol 02:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Arabs and antisemitism, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
If you do not want to receive bot-generated messages on your talk page, please consider using the nobots template on your user talk page

List of designated terrorist organizations

I've put a proposal at Talk:List of designated terrorist organizations to improve the page. Your input is appreciated. CG 22:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Anti-Christian

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Anti-Christian, by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Anti-Christian is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Anti-Christian, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Anti-Christian itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help requested with template

I'm trying to create a spinoff template based on Template:Infobox civilian attack - see Template:Infobox military attack. I want to change a few of the fields, notably "Perpetrator(s)" to "Instigator(s)" and "Suspected perpetrator(s)" to "Conflict". However, I can't get it to work properly and I don't know enough about the template syntax to fix it. Could you please help? -- ChrisO 22:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the "Instigator" field, you had three opening curly brackets but only two closing. I've fixed it. --GCarty 10:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rashidun and Abbasid Caliphates

The Rashidun and Abbasid Caliphates both ruled all of Azerbaijan. The Abbasids also controlled Iberia and Septimania (southern France.) They both covered three continents. See the transcontinental country discussion. Heff01 02:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact the Abbasids never controlled Iberia and Septimania - those lands became the nucleus of the Umayyad rump state. The point about Azerbaijan still holds though. --GCarty 08:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be interested in joining the Wikipedia Crime Project?

I have seen that you like to contribute to serial killer articles I am trying to organize a task force on this subject under Wikipedia:WikiProject Criminal Biography. If you would be interested in joining contact me. Thanks, Jmm6f488 19:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline 191

Why did you merge the character articles?--SGCommand (talk • contribs) 13:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't, MK2 did. --GCarty 16:13, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Boeing 747SP. Thank you. MBK004 13:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Propaganda phrases

Category:Propaganda phrases, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 04:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PCF far-left? No!

Please don't move the French Communist Party to far-left anymore. Firstly, it's not even far-left anymore for a variety of regions. Please don't touch the template based on your opinions. If you don't know about French politics, don't touch it. --Petrovic-Njegos (talk) 15:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, but could you please explain why a communist party is not considered far-left? --GCarty (talk) 18:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For ideological reasons, it's Eurocommunist. It's not trotskyst. And anyways, the French far-left refers to trots, anti-liberals etc. But mostly for technical reasons. It co-operates a lot with the PS or Greenies. Most of their MPs were elected without PS candidates opposing them, their lists in regional elections (if they run one) always rallies the Socialists if they're at 10%. --Petrovic-Njegos (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If "far-left" in the French context means "Trotskyist", might it not be a good idea to make this explicit in the table? --GCarty (talk) 10:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Creationism2

Template:Creationism2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Neelix (talk) 20:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Propaganda films & sub-cats

Category:American propaganda films, Category:British propaganda films and Category:Soviet propaganda films, which you created, have been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the categories' entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 01:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Zoomandbored.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Zoomandbored.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auburn Calloway

Hello, I came upon this article that you started quite some time ago and noticed that another editor has added the {{prod}} template to it. It doesn't look like you were notified, so I thought I'd let you know about it just in case you want to contest the prod. Thanks, Raven1977 (talk) 06:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minor category hierarchy quibble

I think that Category:International sanctions should be a parent of Category:Boycotts of countries. I am not sure if you put it there, but I think that boycotts are a specific type of international sanction and the category hierarchy should reflect this. --John Bahrain (talk) 18:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your decision. --GCarty (talk) 18:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Miniten

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Miniten. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miniten. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello GCarty! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 232 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Poetic Pilgrimage - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

You got caught in a block aimed at some long-term disruption. It won't happen again to you since I've just put your account into the group of IP-block exempted accounts. I'm very sorry for the inconvenience.

Request handled by: Amalthea

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Fair use rationale for File:HackedMuslimWakeup!.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HackedMuslimWakeup!.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 19:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Terrorist incidents involving chemical weapons

Category:Terrorist incidents involving chemical weapons, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 04:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whywefight30vs200.png needs authorship information.

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Whywefight30vs200.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:{{subst:usernameexpand|GCarty}} will produce an appropriate expansion,

or the {{own}} template..

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The True Furqan

I reverted your addition of this page to Category:Religious hoaxes. Please see my comments at its talk page for my reasons. SJK (talk) 10:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category :Propaganda organisations

This edit you made on December 19, 2010 adding the category to the MEMRI article is now being disputed. As the original editor you are entitled to join the talk page discussion. It is also listed here for mediation. Wayne (talk) 01:58, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Aviators killed in shootdowns

Category:Aviators killed in shootdowns, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:16, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nomination

I have nominated Krugersdorp Standard Bank robbery for deletion. Please provide references. Chutznik (talk) 17:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Al-Faran

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Al-Faran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Joyson Prabhu ^{Holla at me!} 00:22, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Combat 786 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Combat 786 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Combat 786 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. UKWikiGuy (talk) 00:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Japanese puppet states

Category:Japanese puppet states, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Muslim reformers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Muslim reformers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Muslim reformers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BDD (talk) 21:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tankie

The article Tankie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources cited, term at best belongs in wikitionary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cerejota ^{If you reply, please place a {{talkback}} in my talk page if I do not reply soon.} 22:22, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tankie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tankie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tankie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cerejota ^{If you reply, please place a {{talkback}} in my talk page if I do not reply soon.} 00:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Executed Yugoslav Nazi collaborators

Category:Executed Yugoslav Nazi collaborators, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 07:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Modern surface-to-air missiles of the United Kingdom

Category:Modern surface-to-air missiles of the United Kingdom, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:12, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-Catholic organizations

Category:Anti-Catholic organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-Muslim organizations

Category:Anti-Muslim organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 17:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kaufmap.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kaufmap.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No reason not to delete this image, as it has been replaced by File:GermanyMustPerish2.jpg. --GCarty (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, GCarty. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 14:25, 18 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 14:25, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation: WikiProject Autism

Greetings! You are hereby invited to WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of autism, Asperger syndrome, and Autistic culture on Wikipedia. As the project emphasizes contribution from autistic editors, it is especially interested in you, who have chosen to list yourself as a Wikipedian with Asperger syndrome. Muffinator (talk) 06:12, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia ads	file info – #251

? re: Really old article you wrote

Masada Action and Defense Movement - an article so ancient you have probably forgotten that you ever wrote it. Problem is, article is still virtually unsourced, and googling the name of this group produces material pointing back to this ancient article. Do you have a minute to take a look and maybe help me out here?ShulMaven (talk) 23:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Torched listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Torched. Since you had some involvement with the Torched redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (talk) 22:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suggested that the redirect be replaced by the new disambiguation page currently at Torched (disambiguation). --GCarty (talk) 13:36, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of military disasters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of military disasters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of military disasters (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ceradon (talk • contribs) 05:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Explosive weapons

I've removed Category:Explosive weapons from Category:Weapons (reverting your edit) because Explosive weapons is already in Weapons, via the categories Ammunition, Firearms, Projectile weapons, and WP:SUBCAT says that "A page or category should rarely be placed in both a category and a subcategory or parent category (supercategory) of that category".

Possibly something else is wrong with the category tree - I don't know, but currently the inclusion directly in Category:Weapons is redundant. Mitch Ames (talk) 11:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:FNL Flag.svg

A tag has been placed on File:FNL Flag.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:10, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HackedMuslimWakeup!.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HackedMuslimWakeup!.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Earl Krugel into 2001 JDL plot in California. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GCarty. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GCarty. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category query?

Hi. Can I ask why you removed this category: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1988_murders_in_the_United_States from this page Phillip Hutchinson. The man murdered a cop in 1988 so is it not appropriate for this category to be included? Inexpiable (talk) 17:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thought categories like that were for murder victims rather than for murderers. --GCarty (talk) 19:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edged weapon listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Edged weapon. Since you had some involvement with the Edged weapon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 18:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of military disasters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of military disasters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of military disasters (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Qatl

The article Qatl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, WP:NOTDICT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 04:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GCarty. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Islamic Fun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islamic Fun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Fun (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coin945 (talk) 08:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North East England, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carlisle and Barton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GCarty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Western Allies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Western Allies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Allies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:14, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Why We Fight

Template:Why We Fight has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. kingboyk (talk) 07:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Campaign for Better Transport (United Kingdom) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campaign for Better Transport (United Kingdom) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campaign for Better Transport (United Kingdom) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- DeFacto (talk). 14:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Finnish neo-Nazis has been nominated for merging

Category:Finnish neo-Nazis has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:New Zealand neo-Nazis has been nominated for merging

Category:New Zealand neo-Nazis has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-Islam political parties in Europe has been nominated for deletion

Category:Anti-Islam political parties in Europe has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mvbaron (talk) 12:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Whoop whoop pull up

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Whoop whoop pull up, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. QueenofBithynia (talk) 23:04, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Whoop whoop pull up" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Whoop whoop pull up and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 16#Whoop whoop pull up until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. QueenofBithynia (talk) 23:30, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 15:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 15:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Anti-nigger vote" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti-nigger vote and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 6 § Anti-nigger vote until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Chinese people executed for collaboration with Japan

A tag has been placed on Category:Chinese people executed for collaboration with Japan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the category has been replaced by Category:Executed Chinese collaborators with Imperial Japan. --GCarty (talk) 12:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Islamic Empire" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect Islamic Empire and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 11 § Islamic Empire until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 16:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Saracen Empire" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Saracen Empire has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 18 § Saracen Empire until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Curiohaus Trial executions

A tag has been placed on Category:Curiohaus Trial executions indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to delete this category, as its name was incorrect: the category seems to have been re-created at the correct location Category:Curiohaus trials executions. I've also linked this corrected English-language category to its German-language equivalent, replacing the category to be deleted. GCarty (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People convicted in the Curiohaus Trial

A tag has been placed on Category:People convicted in the Curiohaus Trial indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to delete this category, as its name was incorrect: the category seems to have been re-created at the correct location Category:People convicted in the Curiohaus trials. I've also linked this corrected English-language category to its German-language equivalent, replacing the category to be deleted. GCarty (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Murderers for life insurance money has been nominated for deletion

Category:Murderers for life insurance money has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 16:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms by Muslims has been nominated for merging

Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms by Muslims has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 18:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Transfare

The article Transfare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. No secondary sources on a regional transport ticket type. Very out of date. Not a single reference and one of the oldest citation needed gags on Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists assassins has been nominated for splitting

Category:Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists assassins has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]